<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>green your world</title>
      <link>http://greenyourworld.org/</link>
      <description>concerning sustainability &amp; activism in food, shelter, lifestyles &amp; community.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:44:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Global Trends 2025</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The National Intelligence Council has published its <a href="http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html">Global Trends 2025 report</a>, hypothesizing on the potential ramifications of current and projected trends. The preliminary assessment about our natural resources is, unsurprisingly, glum:

<BLOCKQUOTE>Unprecedented economic growth, coupled with 1.5 billion more people, will put pressure on resources—particularly energy, food, and water—raising the specter of scarcities emerging as demand outstrips supply.</BLOCKQUOTE>

So despite the fact that our president of the last eight years chose to do nothing to protect the world’s food water and energy supplies—instead putting a fox in every henhouse, refusing to reign in big oil and allowing polluting industries to self-regulate—the intelligence community actually weighs input from the scientific community:

<BLOCKQUOTE>Many scientists worry that recent assessments underestimate the impact of climate change and misjudge the likely time when effects will be felt. Scientists currently have limited capability to predict the likelihood or magnitude of extreme climate shifts but believe—based on historic precedents—that it will not occur gradually or smoothly. Drastic cutbacks in allowable CO<sub>2</sub> emissions probably would disadvantage the rapidly emerging economies that are still low on the efficiency curve, but large-scale users in the developed world—such as the US—also would be shaken and the global economy could be plunged into a recession or worse.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Hopefully the new administration will take seriously the stark warnings this report offers:

<BLOCKQUOTE>Experts currently consider 21 countries, with a combined population of about 600 million, to be either cropland or freshwater scarce. Owing to continuing population growth, 36 countries, home to about 1.4 billion people, are projected to fall into this category by 2025.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

Action on food security, energy independence, resource preservation and climate change are of critical importance. Hopefully <a href="http://www.change.gov">President-elect Obama</a> and his advisors act on such intelligence, unlike another president who has shown <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/">little interest in prophetic security briefings</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/11/global_trends_2025_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/11/global_trends_2025_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Advocacy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:44:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Finally, The Grown-Ups Are In Charge</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Frank Rich, writing in this morning’s <i>New York Times</i>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09rich.html?hp">says</a>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>On the morning after a black man won the White House, America’s tears of catharsis gave way to unadulterated joy.

Our nation was still in the same ditch it had been the day before, but the atmosphere was giddy. We felt good not only because we had breached a racial barrier as old as the Republic. Dawn also brought the realization that we were at last emerging from an abusive relationship with our country’s 21st-century leaders. The festive scenes of liberation that Dick Cheney had once imagined for Iraq were finally taking place—in cities all over America.</BLOCKQUOTE>

<a href="http://www.change.gov"><img title="" src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/obama.jpg" height="150" width="150" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: left;" /></a>

Had I not witnessed such scenes of revelry, I’d suggest that perhaps Mr. Rich was indulging in more than a bit of hyperbole. But watching ordinary Americans dancing in the streets, singing the national anthem, cheering, chanting and even weeping, I was personally reminded of the end of <I>The Return of the Jedi</i>, when the Emperor has finally been vanquished and the Republic restored.  

I think it’s hard to overestimate how significant this win is. Come Inauguration Day, President-elect Obama’s team is preparing to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/08/AR2008110801856.html">overturn 200 executive orders</a> signed by President Bush, many of them related to his administration’s blatant contempt for science. 

I am optimistic right now because President-elect Obama comes across as conscientious and well-informed. He knows that we have serious problems, but also that we’re in this together. Take, for instance this comment about climate change, off-handedly cited in <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581/page/2">Newsweek’s post-election wrap-up</a> (<i>emphasis mine</i>): 

<BLOCKQUOTE>The debates unnerved both candidates. When he was preparing for them during the Democratic primaries, Obama was recorded saying, “I don't consider this to be a good format for me, which makes me more cautious. I often find myself trapped by the questions and thinking to myself, ‘You know, this is a stupid question, but let me … answer it.’ So when Brian Williams is asking me about what's a personal thing that you've done [that's green], and I say, you know, ‘Well, I planted a bunch of trees.’ And he says, ‘I’m talking about personal.’ <b>What I'm thinking in my head is, ‘Well, the truth is, Brian, we can’t solve global warming because I f---ing changed light bulbs in my house. It’s because of something collective’.”</b></BLOCKQUOTE>

For me what makes Obama’s election so gratifying is that he understands the need for big solutions to complex problems—particularly in regard to climate change and sustainability—but that  he is both deliberative and thoughtful in his decision-making process. 

Take, for instance Michael Pollan’s recent letter about food policy to the presidental candidates, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/magazine/12policy-t.html"><i>Farmer in Chief</i></a>. In his thesis, Pollan reasons that the health of our food supply is a national security issue, and that the way we eat today is inexorably tied to a triumvirate of significant challenges; energy independence, healthcare and climate change. 

When asked in <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95896389">a <i>Fresh Air</i> interview</a> with Terry Gross, if either campaign had responded to the article, Pollan answered:

<BLOCKQUOTE>“Well, I haven’t heard from them personally, but one of the campaigns’ transition team did ask me through an intermediary if—you know the article is 8,000 words—could I prepare a one or two page summary for them. And my response to that was ‘Don’t you have staffers who do that?’

The reason I wrote 8,000 words is because that’s what I needed to tell the story. If I could have done it in one or two pages I would have.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

Pollan never indicates, and Gross never asks, which campaign requested the summary. But we now know that President-elect Obama has read the article, because he cites it in a <a href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2008/10/23/the_full_obama_interview/"><i>Time Magazine</i> interview</a> with Joe Klein:

<BLOCKQUOTE>“I was just reading an article in <i>The New York Times</i> by Michael Pollen about food and the fact that our entire agricultural system is built on cheap oil. As a consequence, our agriculture sector actually is contributing more greenhouse gases than our transportation sector. And in the mean time, it's creating monocultures that are vulnerable to national security threats, are now vulnerable to sky-high food prices or crashes in food prices, huge swings in commodity prices, and are partly responsible for the explosion in our healthcare costs because they're contributing to type 2 diabetes, stroke and heart disease, obesity, all the things that are driving our huge explosion in healthcare costs. That's just one sector of the economy. You think about the same thing is true on transportation. The same thing is true on how we construct our buildings. The same is true across the board.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

And what was the McCain campaign’s response? Why <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1987643/">derision of course</a>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>“In a conference call arranged by the McCain campaign [responding to the interview], Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, called it ‘ludicrous to blame farmers for obesity and pollution.’

Said Grassley: “It shows that Sen. Obama doesn't have a very good foundation in American agriculture. And people in agriculture need to know that if Sen. Obama is going to get his ideas on agriculture from a professor at Cal-Berkeley, they should think twice about what they are voting for.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

So we had one candidate with an understanding of the complexity of our food system, and the effect subsidies have had both our environment and the types of crops that are produced. And we had another candidate who mocked thoughtful commentary on our intertwined energy, food and healthcare challenges in an effort to score cheap political points with farmers. 

Thankfully, the more thoughtful candidate won. And I hope that, when inaugurated, President Obama consults with advocates for a variety of sustainability issues. I am heartened that Vice President-elect Biden has long been an <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/riding-the-rails-with-amtrak-joe/">Amtrak commuter</a>, as well as <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/08/joe-biden-fan-amtrak.php">its advocate</a>. 

<a href="http://www.repoweramerica.org"><img title="" src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/welogo.jpg" height="125" width="125" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>

I also hope that Obama will consult with former Vice President Al Gore about his <a href="http://www.repoweramerica.org/">climate change initiatives</a>, and take seriously <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE4A58N620081107">the challenge to create a new electric grid</a>, based on renewable resources, within the next decade. 

Now I know there are some who dismiss this goal as outlandish, economically unsound or even impossible, but as President Kennedy expressed when setting his 10-year timetable to reach the moon, we take on such challenges “…not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”

Having evoked the Kennedy name, while it may only be a wild-eyed fantasy of environmentalists and tree-huggers, it is refreshing to hear <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/06/robert_f_kennedy_eyed_to_head.html">Robert Kennedy, Jr. cited as a potential EPA head</a> in an Obama administration.

As <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/5939345/crimes_against_nature/">Kennedy realized</a> back in 2003, President Bush has not only squandered a terrific opportunity</a> to protect our natural resources over the last eight years, but has, <a href="http://www.salon.com/env/feature/2008/11/08/bush_environmental_sins/">in fact, exacerbated many of our problems</a>. 

While I expect that some of President Obama’s initiatives and appointments will disappoint me, and that congressmen—focused on re-election and the whims of special interests—will sometimes thwart progress, as will a conservative, pro-business judiciary, an understanding of our impact on the environment, and the consequences of our choices is an important first step. 

I don’t think all of those reveling Americans were truly celebrating a libration, but rather, in a shared hope for the promise of tomorrow that this election, and specifically the Obama campaign, represent. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/11/finally_the_grownups_are_in_ch_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/11/finally_the_grownups_are_in_ch_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Advocacy</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lifestyles</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:48:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>At Least ‘Captain Fucking Pork Bun’ Admits He’s A Hypocrite</title>
         <description><![CDATA[As a vegetarian, you get used to being called self-righteous and preachy. You come to expect that family, friends and dining establishments will somehow feel threatened by your choices, even when you suffer silently through their gleeful lack of accommodation for fear of being labeled self-righteous and preachy.

In that vein, it is somewhat amusing to see chef David Chang of momofuku, addressing himself as “Captain Fucking Pork Bun,” explain that even with the rising costs of meat production, “my restaurants still won't kowtow to vegetarians.” OK. Fine. Whatever. 

I get commerce. Sell what you like. Obviously I won’t be eating at momofuku, but Chang’s the <a href="http://nymag.com/restaurants/features/26568/">wunderkind</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/18/nyregion/18lives.html">darling</a> of the <a href="http://www.foodandwine.com/bestnewchefs/?year=2006&chef=B27E2668-721D-43E4-950D7895694244F7">foodie mags</a>, and there are enough committed carnivores out there that he’s not going to go out of business by refusing to cook for vegetarians. 

But does the guy have to be so damn smug about it? Especially when—acknowledging his depression and hypocrisy—Chang concedes that the rising cost of meat production require <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/21st-century-taste-like-1008">a necessary shift in our eating habits</a>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>Let's allow these harsh new realities to force us to do something that Alice Waters has been advocating for decades: Let's finally embrace the truth that food is not something to be taken for granted. As a culture, we need to be more curious about where our food comes from. We need to buy from farmers who are trying to do things the right way. We need to think before we eat.</BLOCKQUOTE>

So Captain Fucking Pork Bun, while I’m sorry you’re a self-important—albeit wildly popular—drama queen, and that cooking without your beloved pork makes you feel like you’re <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/kowtow">kneeling and touching the ground with your forehead</a>, it seems to me that some vegetarians are, in fact, “<a href="http://greenyourworld.org/2008/03/becoming_a_locavore_1.html">curious about where our food comes</a>” from and tend to “<a href="http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/missing_the_point.html">think before we eat.</a>” 
]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/09/at_least_captain_fucking_pork.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/09/at_least_captain_fucking_pork.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:46:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Welcome To My Nightmare</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The August 12<sup>th</sup> <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/12/what-is-the-future-of-suburbia-a-freakonomics-quorum/">Freakonomics column</a> in <i>The New York Times</i> asked a quorum of experts to predict the future of the suburbs.

<a href="http://www.kunstler.com/">Kunstler’s</a> view is predictably, but somewhat convincingly, bleak:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…American suburbia requires an infinite supply of cheap energy in order to function and we have now entered a permanent global energy crisis that will change the whole equation of daily life. Having poured a half-century of our national wealth into a living arrangement with no future — and linked our very identity with it — we have provoked a powerful psychology of previous investment that will make it difficult for us to let go, change our behavior, and make other arrangements.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Though, living in New Jersey, I also found Thomas E. Antus’s tongue-in-cheek predictions both reasonable and chilling. Antus, the administrator of Freehold Township, describes the state's future:

<BLOCKQUOTE> In 40 years I could see living in the world’s largest city, a megalopolis, extending from New York City to Philadelphia and engulfing all of New Jersey. New Jersey could change the state motto to “The Overdevelopment State.” As we already have more cars per square mile than any other state, we could change the shape of the license plates from a rectangle to the outline of a car.</BLOCKQUOTE>

This reminded me of something that I read a few years ago, that New Jersey is on the verge of a “permanent rush hour” as the state becomes even more densely populated. I can’t help but think of <a href="http://www.starwars.com/databank/location/coruscant/">George Lucas’s Coruscant</a>, only without the cool flying cars or the even cooler lightsabers. Unfortunately, the <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0907/Darth_Cheney.html">character of the government</a> seems about the same. 
 
The difference between Antus’s gridlocked megalopolis and Kunstler’s ghettoized ruins is dependent, I think, on whether we have in fact reached <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil">peak oil capacity</a>, and whether the cost of oil will, again, dramatically rise. 

If oil prices stabilize or <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i5TtajgUpSm7KY5jf-lCJGHBB-tAD92KSSJ04">continue to dip</a>, the recent shift to smaller, fuel-efficient vehicles might be set back. Demand for mass transit will slide and Antus’s prediction of “a traffic light on every single corner,” may yet materialize. 

Whether you subscribe to Kunstler’s dystopia, or Antus’s, I think Matthew Yglesias <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/08/the_unknown_future_rolls_toward_us.php">has it exactly right</a>: 

<BLOCKQUOTE>Rising gas prices and various other considerations have prompted this increased round of speculation on whether the suburbanization of America will reverse, but the right answer needs to take into account the fact that what policy choices we make will have a strong impact on the course of the future.</BLOCKQUOTE>

I know which candidate’s <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/additional/#transportation">transportation</a> and <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy">energy</a> policies I’m more inclined to trust. Hint: It’s not the guy eager for a <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/13/mccain-21-century/">land war with Russia</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/08/welcome_to_my_nightmare_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/08/welcome_to_my_nightmare_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lifestyles</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Shelter</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:00:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>You’re The One For Me, Fatty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I think that this should probably be filed under “stating the blindingly obvious,” but when <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/business/03metrics.html"><i>The New York Times</i> runs a story</a> which points out that…

<BLOCKQUOTE>In 1970, the average American ate about 16.4 pounds of food a week, or 2.3 pounds daily. By 2006, the average intake grew by an additional 1.8 pounds a week.

Among other things, that's an extra half pound of fat weekly - mostly from oils and shortening. That doesn't count the fat in the extra quarter pound of meat Americans now eat every seven days.</BLOCKQUOTE>

…is it remotely surprising to read of a new study which suggests that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSCOL66909620080806?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews&rpc=22&sp=true"><i><b>all</i></b> U.S. adults could be overweight within 40 years</a>?

While throwing out absolutes—like 100%—are probably exaggerated, two-thirds of all American adults are overweight today. And thanks to the western diet and an increasingly sedentary lifestyle, things aren't likely to change for the better:

<BLOCKQUOTE>“Genetically and physiologically, it should be impossible” for all U.S. adults to become overweight, said Dr. Lan Liang of the federal government’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, one of the researchers on the study.

However, she told Reuters Health, the data suggest that if the trends of the past 30 years persist, “that is the direction we're going.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

Reading this reminded me of one of this summer’s great films, <a href="http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/wall-e/"><i>WALL·E</i></a>. It may seem absurd to label a cartoon as <i>prescient</i>, but not only has the movie accurately pegged our disposable culture’s disregard for the environment, it seems to have nailed our future selves as well. 

I don't think I could describe <i>WALL·E’s</i> frightening dystopia any better than <a href="http://www.plentymag.com/features/2008/08/walle_review.php">Tobin Hack’s commentary on the film</a> in <i>Plenty</i>. He calls our future selves:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…morbidly obese blobs who spend their monotonous days zooming heavily around on hovering easy chairs, watching private TV screens, and drinking meals-in-a-cup. They can’t walk, and have even forgotten how to interact physically with one another, raising the question of how they’ve been procreating for the past few centuries. Machines take charge of their every need to the point (possibly) of no return.</BLOCKQUOTE>

The movie does treat the future’s fatties with some measure of kindness—a choice I suspect was made to avoid alienating the crowds of overweight Americans watching the film whilst gobbling popcorn by the tub, washed down with their <i>meals-in-a-cup reminiscent</i> <a href="http://www.slurpee.com/">slurpees</a>.

I think the reason the story works so well is that for a sci-fi cartoon, it comes across as credible. Apart from a few athletes and overachievers, if everybody is fat by 2048, what will we look like in Wall·E’s 22<sup>nd</sup> century? How many additional pounds of food will be we devouring each week?

So, what do we do about it? How do we reverse the trend? 

Personally, I like Michael Pollen’s advice: “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594201455?ie=UTF8&tag=greyouwor-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1594201455">Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.</a>”]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/08/youre_the_one_for_me_fatty_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/08/youre_the_one_for_me_fatty_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:39:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mmmm…Meaty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Jonah Lehrer, at <i>The Frontal Cortex</i> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2008/07/good_news_for_vegans.php">draws attention to a new study</a>, which links personal values to taste. Lehrer explains:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…subjects were asked to rate a variety of sausages. People who scored high on “social authority” - they believed it was important to support people in power - tended to label the “vegetarian” sausage as inferior, even when the vegetarian sausage was actually from a cow. Likewise, people who scored low on “social power values” tended to score the vegan sausage much higher than the beef sausage, even when they were actually eating meat. Instead of judging the food product on its merits, they ended up preferring the product that more closely conformed to their value system.</BLOCKQUOTE>

A few years ago, an acquaintance told me a similar story. His father was a food scientist who, in the early 1980s, conducted taste tests for meat substitutes at US shopping malls. Even when served real meat, masquerading as soy, tasters dismissed the food as artificial, and not at all <i>meatlike</i>.

I can relate. Before becoming a vegetarian, I can remember sitting in a Chinese restaurant, disdainfully prodding my tofu and broccoli with a fork. Conversely, I can still feel the sting of disappointment when—after finding a recipe for pork sausage and dutifully recreating the mixture of spices, but for a soy sausage lasagna—my sister disdainfully prodded my creation with her fork. 

To be fair, the more processed a food, the easier it is to mimic the original flavor. Does any hot dog really resemble flesh? It’s much harder—<a href="http://www.horizonsphiladelphia.com/">though not impossible</a>—to imitate gristle or skin.  

So, while a soy sausage might be an objectively suitable meat sausage replacement—<a href="http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/missing_the_point.html">and certainly better for the environment</a>—both foods are so highly processed they should be eaten sparingly, if at all. 

The original study, authored by Michael W. Allen, Richa Gupta and Arnaud Monnier, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/4015305/The-Interactive-Effect-of-Cultural-Symbols-and-Human-Values-on-Taste-Evaluation">can be found here</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/mmmmmeaty.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/mmmmmeaty.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:34:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Sorry State Of Domestic Rail Service</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Ben Jervey, <a href="http://www.goodmagazine.com/section/Features/train_in_vain">writing in <i>Good Magazine</i></a>, describes the motivations of his fellow transcontinental <a href="http://www.amtrak.com">Amtrak</a> travelers:

<BLOCKQUOTE>I counted four types of passengers. There are thrifty ones looking to save a few bucks on plane tickets. There are those who are scared of flying, a group that has no doubt grown in recent years. There are the zealots—without exception, older men—who describe themselves with charming lack of inhibition as “rail junkies,” “railroad nuts,” “train buffs,” or, my personal favorite, “railfans.” The rest—indeed the majority—say they’re here for “the experience.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

Having embarked on a similar rail trek in the fall of 2006, I think Jervey is, more or less, on the money. Apart from the hard-core train enthusiasts most of my fellow passengers intensely disliked flying, wanted to experience train travel or both.

<a href="http://www.amtrak.com"><img title="" src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/amtrak.jpg" height="100" width="150" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: left;" /></a>

If you’re traveling coach, I suppose that Jervey has a point; train travel is cheaper than airline travel. But frankly, even the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/07/11/travel-nonstop-flying-forbeslife-cx_lk_0712longflights.html">world’s longest flights</a> top out at 19 hours. Compare that to a train journey designed to last more than 77 hours, even without the almost certain delays. In my experience this makes a costly sleeper car essential, negating any cost savings over air travel.

In chronicling his experience, Jervey pinpoints several of Amtrak’s biggest challenges. Outside of the northeastern United States, Amtrak must borrow the rail lines from freight companies, whose own schedules take precedent, which translates to major delays. And while the federal government manipulates policy, and lays out all manners of subsidies for aviation and highway transportation,  Amtrak remains a poorly funded bastard-stepchild. In their dealings with the nationalized rail service, <a href="http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=933">President Bush</a> and his hopeful Republican successor, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/07/01/mccains_agenda_on_amtrak/">Senator McCain</a>, both champion that tired right-wing polemic, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/09/national/09cnd-amtrak.html"><i>privatization</i></a>.

The more interesting subtext in this story, however, is in the sheer potential for Amtrak’s growth. Look, domestic train travel is clearly unpopular—it’s slow, inefficient and appeals, essentially, to the thrifty, phobics and afficianados.

But taking the train generates about half of the CO<sub>2</sub> that air travel does<sup id="fn1-2008-07-31">[<a href="#fn1-2008-07-31">1</a>]</sup>. Now a year or so ago that may have driven a few activists to the train, concerned about reducing their carbon footprints, but with rapidly rising gas prices, the demographic of being an activist surely has shifted. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121721483297789245.html">Consider this</a>, from <I>The Wall Street Journal</I>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>A report to be released Monday by the Transportation Department shows that over the past seven months, Americans have reduced their driving by more than 40 billion miles. Because of high gasoline prices, they drove 3.7% fewer miles in May than they did a year earlier, the report says, more than double the 1.8% drop-off seen in April.</BLOCKQUOTE>

This report highlights exactly why $4 gasoline, while painful, may be a good thing. <a href="http://arctic.fws.gov/">ANWR</a> drilling and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/01/mccain/">gas-tax holidays</a> are ill conceived. As <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2008/05/23/arctic-drilling-wouldnt-cool-high-oil-prices.html"><i>U.S. News & World Report</i> explains</a>, The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s latest estimate:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…says that [ANWR] production could range from 510,000 barrels to 1.45 million barrels per day.

If Congress approved development in 2008, it would take 10 years for oil production to commence, EIA said. With production starting, then, in 2018, EIA said the most likely scenario is that oil would peak at 780,000 barrels per day in 2027 and decline to 710,000 barrels per day in 2030. Currently, the United States consumes about 20 million barrels of oil per day.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Pain at the pump is forcing us to rethink our habits. If gasoline remains expensive, people will be forced to make permanent lifestyle changes. And perhaps, rather than completely dismantle our anemic and outdated—yet energy efficient—rail system, the federal government will be forced to reshape its energy and transportation policies. As <a href=""><i>The Wall Street Journal</i> notes</a>, the shift in driving habits:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…furthers many U.S. policy goals, such as reducing oil consumption and curbing emissions. But, coupled with a rapid shift away from gas-guzzling vehicles, it also means consumers are paying less in federal fuel taxes, which go largely to help finance highway and mass-transit systems. As a result, many such projects may have to be pared down or eliminated.</BLOCKQUOTE>

On the other hand, even a short respite from higher fuel costs would, at least temporarily, erase the benefits of higher costs—namely, a new awareness of the impact of our choices. 

Is it any coincidence that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/business/25ford.html">Ford is facing its worst quarterly loss ever</a>, while <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Japan-Earns-Honda.html">Honda is showing record profit</a>? For all of their efforts, like <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/19/AR2007121902012.html">collusion with the EPA</a>, American auto manufacturers are now realizing the impact of their short-sightedness.

While some predicted that the impact of $7 or more a gallon would lead to significant change, it’s almost astonishing how rapidly a much smaller price increase has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/business/09gas.html">changed behavior</a>. And while poor and rural parts of the country are suffering disproportionately, the long-term impact of fuel costs will be felt by everyone.

To my mind, making gasoline temporarily cheaper or increasing domestic capacity ignores the fundamental issue. Much like low-entry adjustable rate mortgages, we've been conditioned to buy giant vehicles with hidden costs, which we ultimately cannot afford. Pushing the American family into the SUV, or even more generally into the automobile-dependent suburbs is simply not sustainable. And, because these same factors will likely decimate <a href="http://www.airlines.org/government/testimony/ATA+VP+and+Chief+Economist+John+Heimlich+Testifies+about+the+Impact+of+High+Jet+Fuel+Prices+on+Air.htm">the airline industry</a>, it would be nice to have a back-up plan when, you know, people <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/business/20air.html">can’t afford to fly</a> or drive wherever the hell they want to. 

The question now is whether we want a <a href="http://www.oldmanmccain.com/">cantankerous old coot</a> for president, who seemingly adheres to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Norquist">Grover Norquist</a> school of policy—divesting the government of all responsibility or authority, until it's small enough to “drown in a bathtub.” Or do we want <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/pdf/FactSheetTransportation.pdf">a leader who</a>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>…supports development of high-speed rail networks across the country. Providing passengers with safe high-speed rail will have significant environmental and metropolitan planning advantages and help diversify our nation’s transportation infrastructure. Our domestic rail freight capacity must also be strengthened because our demand for rail transportation has never been greater, leaving many key transportation hubs stretched to capacity. Obama is committed to renewing the federal government’s commitment to high speed rail so that our nation’s transportation infrastructure continues to support, and not hinder, our nation’s long-term economic growth.</BLOCKQUOTE>

As a final aside, domestic rail service unquestionably has a long way to go before we’re on par with Japanese or European service. Even with funding, it will probably not be a glamorous way to travel for a long time. But, if you’d like to see the possibilities in train travel, though certainly cost-prohibitive, take a look at <a href="http://www.grandluxerail.com/">GrandLuxe Rail Journeys</a>. For those travelers looking for an <i>experience</i> it certainly seems more romantic than riding coach for a cross-continental journey.<br />

<div class="footnote"><id="fn1-2008-07-30">1. From <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/159486781X?ie=UTF8&tag=greyouwor-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=159486781X"><i>The Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook: 77 Essential Skills To Stop Climate Change</i></a>: Including ancillary travel, a round-trip flight from Boston to Washington D.C. generates 776 pounds of CO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the same trip via Amtrak’s Metroliner generates 360 pounds of CO<sub>2</sub>.</id></div>
]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/the_sorry_state_of_domestic_ra.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/the_sorry_state_of_domestic_ra.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Transportation</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:32:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Garlic Dill Pickles</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The last few weeks at the farm have graced us with both cucumbers and dill, providing us a perfect opportunity for pickling. There are two basic forms of pickling: fermentation or vinegar marination. While marinating is perfect for bread &amp; butter pickles, with both cucumbers and dill at our disposal, I decided to ferment some garlic dill pickles.

<center><img src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling1.jpg" mce_src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling1.jpg" align="middle" height="333" width="500"><br />
<div class="lyrics">Kirby cucumbers and dill from Honey Book Organic Farm</div></center>


In addition to being delicious, fermented pickles produce <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactic_acid_bacteria">lactic acid bacteria</a>. Much like yogurt, homemade pickles are “culture active,” and the beneficial bacteria they produce are a vital component in good digestion and maintaining a healthy immune system.

<center><img src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling2.jpg" mce_src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling2.jpg" align="middle" height="333" width="500"><br />
<div class="lyrics">The ingredients: cucumbers, dill, garlic and salt.</div></center>


Some months ago, I picked up a <a href="http://www.perfectpickler.com/home.html"><i>Perfect Pickler</i></a> from our local health food store.  The kit contains a lidded glass jar, a porcelain spacer and a fermentation lock. And preparing dill pickles is remarkably easy.
Simply add 4 cups of cold water and 2 tablespoons of coarse sea salt to the jar, whisking until blended. Add a bunch of fresh dill, bruising the stems first. Next, add 2 pounds of washed un-waxed cucumbers—preferably the Kirby variety. Finally, slice several cloves of garlic and add them to the mix.  That’s it!

<center><img src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling3.jpg" mce_src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling3.jpg"><br />
<div class="lyrics">The cucumbers, dill and garlic, fermenting in salt water.</div>
</center>


Now, put the porcelain spacer in the jar, seal the lid, and put in the fermentation lock, adding some water to the valve. Let the pickles rest in a cool, dry room, away from direct sunlight, and in 4 days you’ll have delicious dill pickles.

<center><img src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling5.jpg" mce_src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/pickling5.jpg" height="333" width="500"><div class="lyrics">The Finished Product</div></center>


If you prefer vinegar-marinated bread &amp; butter or half-sour pickles, <a href="http://www.altonbrown.com/">Alton Brown</a> from <i>Good Eats</i> provides <a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/show_ea/episode/0,1976,FOOD_9956_17108,00.html">excellent recipes</a> at <a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/"><i>The Food Network’s</i> website</a>. One drawback to this method is that it requires sterilized jars. While not difficult this is a necessary, and time-consuming, step.

And, if you don’t like cucumbers, or can’t find them at your favorite local supplier, you can always pickle beets, carrots or cauliflower. Virtually any vegetable you have access to can be pickled using the proper brine or vinegar marinade. 

]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/garlicy_dill_pickles.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/garlicy_dill_pickles.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:56:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The World’s Biggest Jack-Ass</title>
         <description><![CDATA[It’s not so much that the president is intellectually incurious, or that he <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ifTIO4F-5F4uJL8wnzMbDs3wSzzAD91RPPS00">chooses to ignore any scientific evidence</a> that challenges his narrow world view, but rather the fact that <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/2277298/President-George-Bush-%27Goodbye-from-the-world%27s-biggest-polluter%27.html">he remains a foul-mannered frat dick</a>:

<blockquote>The American leader, who has been condemned throughout his presidency for failing to tackle climate change, ended a private meeting with the words: "Goodbye from the world’s biggest polluter."

He then punched the air while grinning widely, as the rest of those present including Gordon Brown and Nicolas Sarkozy looked on in shock.</blockquote>

<a href="http://www.barackobama.com">January 20, 2009</a> cannot come quickly enough. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/the_biggest_jackass_in_the_wor.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/07/the_biggest_jackass_in_the_wor.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Advocacy</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:58:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>This Week’s Share</title>
         <description><![CDATA[You’ve heard the old adage, a picture’s worth a thousand words. So I thought, for those of you who haven't yet experienced buying fresh local food from either a CSA or a farmers’ market, that I’d show you this week's family share of produce from <a href="http://www.honeybrookorganicfarm.com/" target="_blank">Honey Brook Organic Farm</a>.  

<center><img src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/weeklyshare.jpg" title="" mce_src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/weeklyshare.jpg" style="" height="333" width="500"></center>

<p>This week’s crop included lettuce, broccoli, zucchini, basil, kale, cucumbers, dill, cilantro, fennel, parsley, rainbow chard, garlic scapes and radicchio. Keeping in mind that, for a 25 week growing season, this averages to about $24 a week. While some supermarkets <i>might</i> have produce that looks as good, I think it would be very challenging to get as much food for the relatively modest cost.
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/youve_heard_the_old_adage.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/youve_heard_the_old_adage.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:45:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Garlic Scapes</title>
         <description><![CDATA[One of the delicacies from the local farm appears fleetingly in mid-June, the garlic scape. The scape is a long green stalk, which when harvested has a tendency to curl, looking something like a loopy scallion. As garlic grows, the immature scape is trimmed before it becomes hard and papery, allowing for larger bulbs.  

<img title="" src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/scape.jpg" height="100" width="150" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right;" />

The garlic scape seems rare outside of CSAs or farmers’ markets and it seems only recently that chefs are experimenting with its culinary potential. Once people stumble upon the garlic scape and cook with it, they tend to become devoted converts.

Writing for <i>The Washington Post</i>, <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/mighty-appetite/2006/06/my_friend_the_garlic_scape_1.html">Kim O’Donnel explains</a>:

<BLOCKQUOTE>While in Miami over the weekend, I received an e-mail from home base with the subject line: Scapes Are Here!<br />
Even at a distance of 900-plus miles from home, I was delighted by the news that one of my long-anticipated produce items had made its annual debut at the farmer's market. The "scape" in question is hardly a typo or a secret code word; it's shorthand for garlic scape, a part of the garlic plant that is a garlic lover's nirvana.</BLOCKQUOTE>

O'Donnel shares <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/mighty-appetite/2006/06/my_friend_the_garlic_scape_1.html">her recipe</a> for a <I>Garlic Scape Pesto</I>, replacing the traditional basil leaves with scapes, and the pine nuts with walnuts. The result, while garlicky is not oppressively so and is a nice twist on the traditional form.

A full pound of pasta requires only a few tablespoon of the pesto which blissfully—for such a fleeting harvest—freezes well. The food blog <i>What Geeks Eat</i> offers <a href="http://www.whatgeekseat.com/wordpress/2007/06/16/garlic-scape-pesto/">a variation</a> on <i>Garlic Scape Pesto</i>, and <a href="http://www.whatgeekseat.com/wordpress/2007/06/16/garlic-scape-pesto/">recommends</a>: 

<BLOCKQUOTE>…popping some into the freezer to top off my winter soups. I use this pesto on brushetta, pasta, eggs, foccacia, and just about anything I grill like shrimp, salmon, chicken. It’s also fabulous added to mayonnaise and smeared on a big roast beef sandwich.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Melissa Clark, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/dining/18appe.html">introducing a series of garlic-focused recipes</a> in <i>The New York Times</i> mentions her difficulty in finding recipes featuring the scape:

<BLOCKQUOTE>Since my cookbook indexes came up empty in a search for scapes, I called my dad for advice. “Garlic scapes?” he said. “Do you mean green garlic?”<br />

He was referring to the tender crop of garlic that also appears in the market in spring, bulbs still attached to their green floppy tops. Having become addicted to their juiciness and musky sweetness, I always make a point to buy plenty when I see them.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Clark chronicles a bit of her experimentation before offering a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/dining/183arex.html?ref=dining">recipe for</a> <i>White Bean and Garlic Scapes Dip</i>. When we tried the dip at home, it came together very quickly and tasted delicious, whether served on dried pita crackers, or with a simple crudité.

While the garlic scape serves as an exciting new avenue of exploration for garlic aficionados, it is also rather mild and a somewhat more delicate form of the flavor. I'd urge those of you who find garlic a bit too overbearing to consider the scape. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/garlic_scapes.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/garlic_scapes.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:15:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Missing The Point</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.locavores.com">locavore</a> movement, and the associated concept of <i>food miles</i> have been receiving renewed attention recently, thanks to new research <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/apr/science/ee_foodmiles.html">published in Environmental Science & Technology</a>.  The authors of the research, Christopher Weber and Scott Matthews of Carnegie Mellon University, explain that while eating locally does reduce the carbon footprint of the typical family’s diet, “eating less red meat and dairy can be a more effective way to lower an average U.S. household’s food-related climate footprint than buying local food.” 

<a href="http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/apr/science/ee_foodmiles.html"><img title="" src="http://www.greenyourworld.org/images/foodmiles.jpg" height="264" width="150" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right;" /></a>

In other words, production matters more than transportation—with food production accounting for 83% of food related emissions, and only 11% tied to its transportation. And according to Weber and Matthews, the biggest offenders are red meat and dairy, which together account for nearly half of greenhouse gas emissions from an average family’s food. 

While moving to an entirely local diet is the equivalent of a 1000 mile per year household reduction, <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/apr/science/ee_foodmiles.html">the summary of the study's findings</a> suggests that making other dietary changes can offer even greater impact.

<BLOCKQUOTE>Replacing red meat and dairy with chicken, fish, or eggs for one day per week reduces emissions equal to 760 miles per year of driving. And switching to vegetables one day per week cuts the equivalent of driving 1160 miles per year.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Writing for <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/do-we-really-need-a-few-billion-locavores/">the Freakonomics column in <i>The New York Times</i></a>, Stephen J. Dunber seizes on this research to support his attempted deconstruction of the locavore concept. 

Dunbar raises four specific arguments with which he challenges the benefits of local food: taste, health benfits, cost and environmental impact. He begins by explaining:

<BLOCKQUOTE> We made some ice cream at home last weekend. Someone had given one of the kids an ice cream maker a while ago and we finally got around to using it. We decided to make orange sherbet. It took a pretty long time and it didn’t taste very good but the worst part was how expensive it was. We spent about $12 on heavy cream, half-and-half, orange juice, and food coloring — the only ingredient we already had was sugar — to make a quart of ice cream. For the same price, we could have bought at least a gallon (four times the amount) of much better orange sherbet. In the end, we wound up throwing away about three-quarters of what we made. Which means we spent $12, not counting labor or electricity or capital costs (somebody bought the machine, even if we didn’t) for roughly three scoops of lousy ice cream.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Before addressing any of his other arguments, I’d suggest that Dunbar is being disingenuous from the start.  He claims to “very much understand the locavore instinct,” but his arguments about local food are based simply on having purchased all of the ingredients from the supermarket. 

Were the cream and the half-and-half supplied by a local farmer, who supports organic farming processes? Does Dunbar live in Florida or California, where oranges are plentiful, and could easily be harvested into freshly squeezed juice? And can anyone say, with a straight face, that purchasing and using food-coloring in homemade sherbet is not a complete violation of the spirit of eating locally?

I will concede Dunbar’s first point—that taste is entirely subjective, and that the merits of locally grown food cannot be argued on their flavor. But I take issue with his second point, which addresses the nutritional impact of a local diet. He reasons:

<BLOCKQUOTE>There’s a lot to be said for the nutritional value of home-grown food. But again, since one person can grow only so much variety, there are bound to be big nutritional gaps in her diet that will need to be filled in.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Home-grown is not the same thing as local! Has Dunbar ever heard of a CSA? Has he ever visited a farmers’ market? The general consensus regarding a local diet is that food should be produced within 100 miles from the home—not in the backyard, or simply purchased in the supermarket.

Surely organic vegetables, cultivated on a nearby farm or dairy and eggs, acquired from local producers—free from antibiotics and hormones, and supplied from healthy livestock—are more healthful than anything made with food coloring! 

The questionable safety of engineered foods are tied directly to the processing and additives it takes to create them—and not just known troublemakers, like the long-discontinued <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,945520,00.html">Red Dye No. 2</a>, or even it's <i>safe</i> replacement, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allura_Red_AC">Red Dye No. 40</a>, which is likely found in Dunbar's orange food coloring. We're constantly ingesting an array of additives—natural and artificial flavors or preservatives—that make their way into the efficiently produced foods that Dunbar seems to champion. 

Whether one actively champions <i>specialization</i> or begrudgingly accepts it as a necessary fact of modern life, <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/specialization-not-as-recent-as-you-may-think/">as Dunbar seems to</a>, the further away you are from your food source, the less you really know about how it was produced and what is in it.

And the efficiencies of specialization, by their very nature, lend themselves to highly-processed, factory foods. In this regard, even cases where it cannot be concretely proven, I'd personally be more likely to trust food acquired from a local producer than food supplied by an agribusiness conglomerate, via the supermarket.

In his third point of criticism, Dunbar suggests that a local diet is more expensive than one made less costly via economies of scale. Now, if I tried to re-purchase my weekly yield of organic produce from <a href="http://www.honeybrookorganicfarm.com">Honey Brook Organic Farm</a> from a supermarket like Whole Foods, I would be spending exponentially more money. 

But for the sake of argument I will concede this point to Dunbar. Maybe I don't really need organic arugula, and maybe I can get by with a pint of strawberries instead of the 4 quarts that are sitting in my refrigerator. For the sake of argument let’s pretend that I’m spending more money than I would on <i>specialized</i> food. 

When I worked in ‘Corporate America’ and had to send projects out to bid, we had something of an unwritten rule. A vendor can never deliver a product that is cheap, fast and good. A final product can embody any two of these qualities, but never all three. 

I'd argue that food from a local source is quick, especially when factoring the time spent traveling from field to plate. I'd also argue that it’s good, though this is arguably subjective if we’re again referring to taste. In any event, it is ‘good’ if you acknowledge the value of whole foods, which I do. 

So if whole foods, fresh from the fields are a bit more expensive, so what? It seems to me, that with as much as we know about health and wellness—and the critical nature of a healthy diet—purchasing quality foods is not the place where you want to cut corners with your budget. 

And while the initial cost of a local diet might be a bit more expensive, this changes when you look the long-term impact of our food choices. When Dunbar considers the cost of food, does he think about the higher taxes and health-insurance costs he will undoubtedly pay to combat the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-11-12-diabetes-children_N.htm">looming Type 2 diabetes crisis</a>? According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/nyregion/nyregionspecial5/09diabetes.html"><i>The New York Times</i></a>, a generation of children in the U.S., raised on inexpensive processed foods, are facing an epidemic:

<BLOCKQUOTE>One in three children born in the United States five years ago are expected to become diabetic in their lifetimes, according to a projection by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The forecast is even bleaker for Latinos: one in every two.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Dunbar’s final argument about the value of a local diet references the new research from Weber and Matthews. Summarizing their findings, he states:

<BLOCKQUOTE>This is a pretty strong argument against the perceived environmental and economic benefits of locavore behavior…</BLOCKQUOTE>

Uh, no. This is a pretty strong argument that we should not be eating beef. If we're particularly bothered by the planet’s poor health, we may want to cut back on the dairy, chicken and fish too. And hey, if we’re feeling incredibly zealous, maybe we should consider a vegan diet. 

The study’s findings do not invalidate the ecological benefit of a local diet—they just indicate that other behaviors are even more beneficial. So why not do both?

A local diet will reduce a family’s carbon footprint by 1000 miles. That is an impact. But let’s couple that impact with the sacrifice of red meat and dairy for a single day of the week. Suddenly, we’ve reduced our impact by a combined 1760 miles. If we remove red meat and dairy entirely from the family’s diet, replacing it with local foods, we've reduced our impact by 6,320 miles.

But, you might say, “I like beef!” That’s fine, but behaviors have consequences, and in this case what’s bad for the environment is also bad for us. 

Leaving aside illnesses brought on by the improper handling or preparation of food—including E. coli and salmonella—the consumption of red meat is tied to a variety of cancers, cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, bone loss and arthritis. 

As I mentioned earlier, while discussing the hidden costs of our food, there are long-term, often unrecognized, impacts to our food choices. Not just the monetary cost of medical treatment, but also in dehabilitation, in coping with painful symptoms and in shortened life spans. 

We live in a day and age of instant gratification, tending to ignore the impact of our choices beyond the moment. Being aware of these impacts, whether to our health or the health of the planet, gives us the information to make smarter choices. Obviously not everyone is going to become a locavore and vegan to reduce their family's carbon footprint by the equivalent 9,120 miles. In fact, I suspect nearly no one will make that sacrifice, it’s a fairly radical step. But if enough people understand the impact of our food choices on the world around us, and make smaller changes, the combined result may be enough to make a significant difference. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/missing_the_point.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/missing_the_point.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:06:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Ephemeral Nature Of Food</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Throughout New Jersey, harvest season has begun, and local farms and CSAs are now opened to their share members. If you haven’t already joined a farm it’s likely too late for this season, but it is still possible to eat locally. Be sure to visit <a href="http://www.localharvest.org">Local Harvest</a>, to find a local produce stand or farmers’ market.

For the second year in a row, my wife and I have joined <a href="http://www.honeybrookorganicfarm.com">Honey Brook Organic Farm</a>, in Pennington. One of the things I learned very quickly last summer was that a locally grown harvest is much more ephemeral than the supermarket has conditioned us to believe. While it’s possible to purchase imported strawberries at the grocery store throughout the summer, after a few fleeting weeks in late May and early June, strawberries from the local farm might disappear until next summer. After a few weeks, the broccoli you’ve been cooking with will be gone.

Building a diet around locally sourced produce, you cannot take for granted that you will have access to all of the ingredients for your favorite recipes. To aid in finding recipes tuned to the local harvest, the staff at Honey Brook recommended “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1423600142?ie=UTF8&tag=greyouwor-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1423600142"><i>Farmer John's Cookbook: The Real Dirt on Vegetables</i></a>,” a cookbook from farmer John Peterson and Angelic Organics. Farmer John converted his family farm outside of Chicago to a CSA, and now serves more than 1,200 families.

The cookbook is organized according to the growing season, and builds recipes around vegetables and herbs that are likely to be harvested together. Now obviously, there’s nothing to prevent you from subsidizing a local diet with additional produce, purchased from the supermarket. This might be the ideal—allowing for a greater variety of meals—especially if you’re purchasing local foods from a farmers’ market or produce stand.

With a share in a CSA, however, buying vegetables outside of the CSA may not be as practical, due simply to the volume of the food you’re likely to receive. Even in my vegetarian household it’s a challenge to use all of the produce we receive from our farm share, particularly at the height of the growing season. Buying produce outside of the farm would be counterproductive, and likely result in waste.

To help minimize waste, the staff at Honey Brook recommended a second book, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1931686807?ie=UTF8&tag=greyouwor-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1931686807"><i>Field Guide to Produce: How to Identify, Select, and Prepare Virtually Every Fruit and Vegetable at the Market</i></a>,” which offers tips on selection, storage and preparation. Storing fruits and vegetables properly, to maximize their freshness, and selecting wisely at the farm stand may offer a few more days of ripening or refrigeration.

In our house, once we return from the farm with our weekly yield, we put away all of our fruits and vegetables and begin working on a menu for the week. Working with <i>Farmer John’s Cookbook</i>, as well as some of our other favorite vegetarian recipes, we try to prepare our produce as efficiently as possible. And while we eat, we try to savor our meals, remembering that next week or next month our seasonal menu will have disappeared for another season. ]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/the_ephemeral_nature_of_food.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/06/the_ephemeral_nature_of_food.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:22:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>More On The Global Food Crisis</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Following up on <a href="http://greenyourworld.org/2008/04/food_shortages_1.html">yesterday’s post</a> about food shortages and higher prices throughout the world, I stumbled on two interesting articles this morning. 

Brett Arends, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120881517227532621.html">writing for the <i>Wall Street Journal</i></a> suggests that it is time to begin stockpiling food, purely from an economic standpoint. In Arends’s reasoning, the costs of food are simply going to get more expensive, with the food inflation rate currently at about 4.5%. However, he adds:

<BLOCKQUOTE>The latest data show cereal prices rising by more than 8% a year. Both flour and rice are up more than 13%. Milk, cheese, bananas and even peanut butter: They're all up by more than 10%. Eggs have rocketed up 30% in a year. Ground beef prices are up 4.8% and chicken by 5.4%.</BLOCKQUOTE>

The<i> Journal’s</i> piece puts the blame on the growing middle class in China, and their desire for better foods, and of course on ethanol. 

An <a href="http://www.nysun.com/news/food-crisis-eclipsing-climate-change">article in today’s <i>New York Sun</i></a> also ties the current crisis to ethanol production. Estimating that 30% of the US corn crop is used for ethanol production, <i>The Sun</i> spoke with economics professor Benjamin Senauer, who reasoned:

<BLOCKQUOTE>“It takes around 400 pounds of corn to make 25 gallons of ethanol. It’s not going to be a very good diet but that’s roughly enough to keep an adult person alive for a year.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

Mr. Senauer also suggests that global warming advocates denounce ethanol as a solution to climate change. 

<BLOCKQUOTE>“Crop-based biofuels are not part of the solution. They, in fact, add to the problem. Whether Al Gore has caught up with that, somebody ought to ask him,” the professor said. “There are lots of solutions, real solutions to climate change. We need to get to those.”</BLOCKQUOTE>

I tend to agree here, as food shortages are going to be exacerbated by rising temperatures and the ensuing drought conditions. In this perfect storm of crises, I wonder if we will start to radically shift not just our misguided energy policy, but our entire social structure to achieve the drastic reduction in energy use that is required.]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/04/more_on_the_global_food_crisis.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/04/more_on_the_global_food_crisis.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:36:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Trifecta: Food, Housing &amp; Energy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[When my sister was in high school she participated in a US student exchange program with Russia. It struck me then how in awe of our supermarkets the Russian students were. They always wanted to load up the shopping cart with as much as we could carry, fearing the food would be gone the next day.

And here we are, some fifteen years later, facing that reality. Thanks to the rising global cost of rice, consumers in the US are beginning to stockpile, and now both <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-rice24apr24,0,3320375.story">Sam’s Club and Costco have implemented purchasing limits</a>. 

Then there’s this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2232840220080422">worrisome news from Reuters</a>: 

<BLOCKQUOTE>Rye flour stocks have been depleted in the United States, and by June or July there will be no more U.S. rye flour to purchase, said Lee Sanders, senior vice president for government relations and public affairs at the American Bakers Association.</BLOCKQUOTE>

It’s not just rye though. 

<BLOCKQUOTE>For bakers, rye grain is not the only supply stock that is declining. In the past the market has typically had a three-month surplus of wheat stocks to serve as a cushion against supply interruptions, but now the surplus is down to less than 27 days worth of wheat, Sanders said.</BLOCKQUOTE>

Last June, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2007-06/america-headed-food-shortage">Popular Science predicted</a> ethanol-related food shortages, pointing out:

<BLOCKQUOTE>A recent study conducted by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State University (which receives funding from grocery manufacturers and livestock producers) reported that U.S. ethanol production could consume more than half of U.S. corn, wheat and coarse grains by 2012, driving up food prices and causing shortages. The study estimates that booming ethanol production has already raised U.S. food prices by $47 per person annually. </BLOCKQUOTE>

So essentially, in their effort to curb our oil dependency, the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/energy/">Bush Administration's ethanol policy</a> is depleting our food supply, all so we can continue to recklessly burn through gasoline commuting from our suburban McMansions, built by development companies that have been destroying our farmland—and by extension our ability to grow enough crops to feed ourselves. 

But as that wise philosopher, Dick Cheney once reminded us, “Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.”

So we’ve got <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/energyprices.html">rising oil prices</a>, food shortages and a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2233380820080422">continued collapse</a> of the <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/24292550">housing market</a>. Does anyone not believe these things are all interrelated, or that the overlapping fall-out from all three make don’t make for a bleak picture? 

But hey, don’t let it ruin your summer. John McCain wants to give us a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24120727/">gas-tax holiday</a>, a move that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120900047323640215.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Hillary Clinton hasn't ruled out either</a>. In fairness, Barack Obama <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_oil_spill.html">seems to be striking a populist note</a>, where he decries the oil industry’s record profits more than he is championing a better energy policy. 

To varying degrees, all three candidates are dancing around the big picture—as oil becomes scarcer and more difficult to acquire, prices will continue to go up. A gas-tax holiday is an insane idea in the face of dwindling supply. More affordable dependency is not what addicts need. 

But hey, conservation isn’t the basis for a sound energy policy, right? For that matter conservation doesn’t seem to be the basis for a pandering campaign strategy either. 
]]></description>
         <link>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/04/food_shortages_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://greenyourworld.org/2008/04/food_shortages_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Advocacy</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Food</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:47:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
